Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 970107_apr96_decls13_0006.txt
Subject: DUSTY AGENTS IMPLICATIONS FOR CHEMICAL WARFARE PROTECTION
Unit: XVIII CORPS
Parent Organization: ARCENT
Box ID: BX000047
Folder Title: CHEMICAL INFORMATION
Document Number: 5
Folder Seq #: 35
CONFIDENTIAL
AsT-266OZ-055-88
27 January 1988 pop
demonstrated that 80'& by weight load- (U) The Germans preferred to use
ings of mustard on a dry powder car- carrier dusts with a7ents that were
rier could be achieved. Extensive difficult to volatilize. A nitrogen
dusty agent work was conducted by mustard (HN3) was found to be as
the German Wehrmacht during World effective in killing mice when ad-
War 11 at Spandau. This CW dust sorbed on dust as in the,vapor phase
work, which evaluated numerous car- (LCt5O - 1200 mg,mia/mO). Hi-her
rier materials and agents, suggested concentrations of the impreg;:ted
that vesicants were particularly dust produced a lower LCt5O, down to
effective in the dust form and yield- 400 mg,min/m3 when the OUsty a,.enr-
ad the first evidence of the effec- concentration was 800 mg/m.
tiveness of finely divided dust
against protective clothing. The (U) The Germans did not prefer sul-
Germans were also the first to fur mustard (H) on a carrier dust
propose the use of nerve agents because the only advantage they saw
adsorbed on dust. The extent of was that the dusty R could be used
this German work has only recently at lower temperatures than neat ii.
been rediscovered in the West. They were much more enthusiastic
about the use of other sulfur-
What azents are most effective in a coutainiag mustards such as T-must--rA-
dusty form? (U) (I) and sesqui-musrard (Q). These
agents are much more effective than
(C) Experiments conducted during H and, because of their low volatil-
"orld War II in both Germany and the ity, are best disseminated by the
United States showed that vesicant dust method. Volunteer subjects who
(blister) aerosols were effective were exposed to 675 mg/m3 of Q ad-
both through inhalation and through sorbed on dust for 10 minutes (Ct -
percutaneous (skin) contact. One of 6750 mg,min/m3) suffered erythema
the advantages of World '.;at II era and small blisters that took days to
data is that it includes many direct h-nl. The technical personnel who
human toxicological evaluations. were carrying out the tests and were
ilierefore, no extrapolation needs to protected by well-fittiao. and cota-
be made from animal data or from com- plate skin protection (according to
puter models to estimate what would the Germans) suffered from severe
be effective against human beings. erythema and oedema and, in some
The agents either work or they don't. cases, massive vesication. Similar
tests were carried out with T at a
(U) After investigating the use of concentration of 177 mg/m3 for
imoregnated dusts at their Spandau 10 minutes. Vesication occurred af-
'a
. cility, the Germans concluded that ter 24 hours. Workers wearing pro-
nonvolatile vesicant agents are par- tective clothing were again affected.
arly effective They,found that
concentrations of S;o mg/m' of a ves- (U) During World War II, workers at
icant agent (not identified) and rel- the University of Chicago Toxicology
atively short periods of exposure are Laboratory (UCTL) investigated the
sufficient to severely affect even effect of partir-le size upon the
troops wearing complete protective vesicancy of UN3 and T on hit-an sub--
clothing. jects. HN3 vapor produced erythema
2 1)@t;
DOD
CONFIDENTIAL
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
Document 22 f:/Week-15/BX000047/CHEMICAL INFORMATION/dusty agents implications for chemical warfare p:010297184311120
Control Fields 17
File Room = apr96_declassified
File Cabinet = Week-15
Box ID = BX000047
Unit = XVIII CORPS
Parent Organization = ARCENT
Folder Title = CHEMICAL INFORMATION
Folder Seq # = 35
Subject = DUSTY AGENTS IMPLICATIONS FOR CHEMICAL WARFARE P
Document Seq # = 5
Document Date =
Scan Date =
Queued for Declassification = 01-JAN-1980
Short Term Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Long Term Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Permanent Referral = 01-JAN-1980
Non-Health Related Document = 01-JAN-1980
Declassified = 02-JAN-1997