IS U.S. MARINES IN THE PERSIAN GULF, 1990-1991 This view of a strong and capable Iraqi Army was very likely correct for the early days of Operation Desert Shield, with morale still high and the integrity of units not yet destroyed by death and desertion. By the middle of December, as the division was arriving in theater, a more defined picture of the enemy was developed. At a briefing given by Lieutenant General Bernard E. Trainor, USMC (Ret), the strengths and weaknesses of the Iraqi Army were detailed. The Iraqi soldiers were described as "conscripts who endure," and who were not required to do very much. They were secular in nature, without the religious fervor demonstrated by the Iranians. Great emphasis was placed on maintaining their morale, but they had demonstrated during the Iran-Iraq War that given the opportunity, they would break and run. The !raqis were known to have large amounts of artillery and they bad shown that they could use it properly; although not as proficient as U.S. forces, when they fired massed artillery they could assume that they had killed the target in their fire sack. Their engineers were rated as "very good." They were said to be intelligent, highly motivated, and innovative. They could operate quickly and efficiently under fire, and could create defensive sectors rapidly, even building higher terrain as necessary to take advantage of tactical situations. Their tactical air was "very poor," and their logistics were very vulnerable, especially with the numerous types and calibers of weapons which they had to supply.69 The beginning of the air campaign, the first phase of Operation Desert Storm, on 16 January, required continuing reassessments of the enemy's capabilities and intentions. One immediate effect of the constant bombing was the ever-increasing number of line-crossers surrendering to the division. These enemy prisoners of war (EPWs) often told of low morale and high desertion rates in the Iraqi units.~ Although comforting, these tales could not be accepted uncritically; deserters are not the most reliable sources of information. As the division moved up to Al Kibrit and later to Al Khanjar, the G-2 section focused its efforts on the important task of gathering information and disseminating intelligence about the specific enemy units to the front. Their work in identifying the enemy units facing the division was highly accurate; prior to the attack it was known that the 2d Marine Division's area of operations was occupied by the 7th and 14th Iraqi Divisions, both part of the Iraqi III Corps. These divisions were composed, respectively, of the 19th, 38th, 39th, and 116th Infantry Brigades; and the 14th, 18th, 56th, and 426th Infantry Brigades. The brigades were arrayed in depth along the defensive lines; beyond them were part of the III Iraqi Corps' operational reserves, the 3d Armored Division, composed of the 6th and 12th Armored Brigades and the 8th Mechanized Brigade. Also in the zone was the 20th Mechanized Brigade, whichFirst Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Src Image |