Macfarlane GJ., Silman AJ., Creed F., Cherry NM
University of Manchester, United Kingdom
With the objective of determining whether there is excess
morbidity amongst Gulf War Veterans a cross-sectional prevalence study
is being undertaken to determine whether Gulf War Veterans report more
symptoms of ill-health in comparison to military personnel who did not
serve in the Gulf.
Prior to undertaking the main study a pilot study was conducted
on 200 subjects (100 Gulf and 100 Non-Gulf Veterans). One of the aims
of the pilot study was to determine effective methods of contacting subjects
and establish the participation rate which could be achieved. Subjects
were required to complete a questionnaire about their health which enquired
about the degree to which they had been troubled by ninety-five symptoms
during the past month. In addition subjects indicated overall how much
they had been troubled by ill-health during the past month. All such responses
were on a visual analogue scale with the extremes labelled "Not at
all" and "Very Severely". The questionnaire was mailed
to non-serving study subjects at their last known home address with a
reminder letter to non-responders. For those still not responding a variety
of techniques were used including verifying and/or obtaining new addresses,
sending further questionnaires, telephoning subjects, personal visits.
Subjects still serving were either visited at their military base or received
a mailed questionnaire with a similar follow-up schedule to non-serving
personnel for those not responding.
The overall participation rate in the pilot study was 91%
after four months. The presentation will assess to what extent "reluctant"
responders and those subjects initially untraced, whose participation
would not have been obtained in the pilot study without considerable effort,
differ in terms of self-reported current health from those traced subjects
who responded to the initial questionnaire or reminder letters. The implications
for current studies will be considered.
KEYWORDS: Health Status; Response Rates
Medical Research Council
|