Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 120596_aadab_08.txtsame physical properties of the contaminants the aircraft could encounter. An aircraft had talcum powder applied loosely to it surface to simulate the type of contact contaminants would have with the airframe. In addition, certain parts of the aircraft had powder rubbed into the surface of the airframe skin. This type of application would be far more adhering than any contamination encountered on actual missions. After the application of powder, the aircraft was then flown in the local area, with the airspeed and time of the sortie approximating a return flight from enemy airspace. After the test aircraft landed, it was then inspected to determine how much of the simulated contamination remained. This inspection showed that all of the loosely applied powder had come off during flight, while winds removed almost all of the rubbed-in powder. From this test, the wing determined that in actual combat, only a minuscule percentage of any contamination would remain on the aircraft While the chances of aircraft carrying chemical or biological agents back to the base were slim, the possibility did exist. For this reason, the wing planned to decontaminate all aircraft after they recovered from combat sorties. King Fahad Air Base had no integral decontamination facilities, so the wing had to improvise. The method arrived at consisted of using 1,500 gallon water trucks to spray down the aircraft after they returned to base The trucks were fitted with four fire hoses, with fittings designed and manufactured on base. On 14 and 15 January the wing
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search