Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 0000020.txt
5 U.S.C. 552 (b)(6)
procedures. I do not belleye that the issue was specifically addressed.
EOD Personnel were in charge on the site and were responsible for the
conduct of the clearing operation. With respect to
and , I gave no specific safety briefing out it was understood
that unless airected by EOD. these troops could not cross into a
contaminated z-rea. I old not witness any of the operations at the ammo
pits and the down ioading of tne munitions. The ammo, oits were aug to
place the ordnance in until demolition could oe scheduled. I'm not sure
what was done with the ordnance the iirst couple oi days of the clearing
operations since the pits were not dug until two to tnree Cays aite- tne
explosion on the llth.
The Regiment briefed the clearing ooerations at tno daily iiQi~-,.-
(0700 hours) operations A written order was precared for tne
clear0a coerations in Ist Squadron s motorpool and was adanted ana
adjuite~ as ne*deo wnen clearing 2a Squadron's motorpo6l.
To tAe best of my knowledge, wnenever I was oresent at a clearing
operation, all EOD personnel and Blackhorse support personnel were always
in Kevlar helmets and flak vests while clearing ooerations were being
conducied. I observed many clearing operations conducted by EOD and never
observed any safety violation by either EOD soldiers or Regiment soldiers
supporting EOD. i never observed any significant change o? attitude in any
EOD soldiers tnrOLj9nout the clearing operation.
f-AJ . USA
=worn to z.ra 3ubscr:oed beiore me this tn day of Julv ii:;I:
I ---
MAJ, jA
Regimental Judge Acvocate
6 U.S.C. 552 (b)(6)
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search