Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: doc08_30.txt
1-
Appendix E
Use of pyri~o~tig~~'x1e. B.i;..~~.tde
In 1985, TAO initiated the grou~d testitig of all airc~~~s. with
;~~\~~~ P~~~t~n~~~n bromide. Reported side. effects were so low (<1%) that ~-ig
1~. Durin Operation Desert Storm, some units ~ `4
begin doiti no prophylaxiS. The foliQwing re~~ ~t* pro. vid ed
from a questionnaire he prepared and distri~b~ted. &~ a
~~ployed Wing.
~estionnaires distributed = l5SItreturned 1O~~ (ret~~ ~te 68%)
Findi~ngs
Compliance ~as poor only 9.5% completed the ~II directed ~`xr~e of 7
day& 61% had quit the prophylaxis after three days. 5.7* did ~wt begin
prophylaxis:
-Side effects were prevalent in an ancontrO~ed *ssew~efl.t (6.2%
raported ao~e side effects)
Headaches 8%
Ras~ 2%
sQninolence 5%
Weakness 5%
sa';ivat~oniTearw~g
Bloated stomach 6%
i~elly crarflpS 10%
Loose bowel movements 1s%
9%
Two or more atoolsIday 4%
Muscle cr~p# 0rtwitching
-The mQst common aide ~ct5 wOr' gas~oin~St~al --40%
p~doetigxx~ine side eft~~ had ao adver*e ~~~~ on ~q mi~i0.n -~
100% said no missions were ~~nceUod a~. to side e~CtL
-Side effects were a significant but not predominant ~aso; ~
~~~ca.* of the 91% who stoppod prophylanS. bef~re author~'.* 36.5% stated
side effects were the reason
In a leoforinal report' an Fle wing SME ettimated only 20%. 0.
order to take pyridosti~ anw:1g pilots. Of those, 3O~4Q~ co~~Od Q~
s;do effects (abdo;in;i cr';Ping.~an'~. ~us~). Thoce w~ did not c4ZflplY ~~
~~ncerta1.nty about a strange m~dica~on and the apparent low threat Of ~~~i~C*..~
~t~ct as ret~S0n5
.29-
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search