Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search

File: 061896_cia_62758_62758_01.txt
Page: 01
Total Pages: 1

Subject: IRAQI CW AND BW

Not Finally Evaluated Intelligence







TO FACILITATE ELECTRONIC ACCESS, THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN

REFORMATTED TO ELIMINATE INFORMATION THAT DOES NOT PERTAIN

TO GULF WAR ILLNESS ISSUES OR THAT IS CLASSIFIED. A COPY OF

THIS REDACTED DOCUMENT, IN ORIGINAL FORMAT, IS AVAILABLE ON

REQUEST.







SEP 90







SUBJECT: IRAQ'S POTENTIAL FOR CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE







KEY JUDGEMENTS

IRAQ HAS SUBSTANTIAL CHEMICAL WARFARE CAPABILITIES THAT, AS

DEMONSTATED IN THE WAR WITH IRAN, IT IS PREPARED TO USE. IRAQ ALSO

HAS SOME BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS BUT HAS NEVER USED THEM IN COMBAT.

IN COMBAT WITH US AND ALLIED FORCES

CHEMICAL WEAPONS:

X--THE EXTENSIVE EXPERIENCE IRAQI FORCES GAINED IN USING

CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST IRAN WOULD BE APPLIED AGAINST US AND ALLIED

FORCES.

X--IRAQ'S FORCES WOULD BE VIRTUALLY CERTAIN TO USE CHEMICAL

WEAPONS IN ANY DEFENSIVE SITUATION IN IRAQ OR KUWAIT WHERE THEY WERE

BEING PUSHED BACK BY AN ALLIED OFFENSIVE.







X--THEY WOULD BE HIGHLY LIKELY TO USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS AS AN

INTEGRAL PART OF ANY OFFENSIVE INTO SAUDI ARABIA.

X--ONCE THE IRAQI FORCES HAD BEGUN USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS

AGAINST ALLIED FORCES, WE ANTICIPATE THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO USE

THEIR ENTIRE CHEMICAL ARSENAL, INCLUDING MISSILES WITH CHEMICAL

WARHEADS.

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS:

X--BECAUSE IRAQ HAS NEVER USED BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, WE HAVE

LITTLE TO GO ON REGARDING HOW OR WHETHER SADDAM WOULD USE THESE

WEAPONS AGAINST US AND ALLIED FORCES. HE PROBABLY CONSIDERS THEM TO

BE WEAPONS OF LAST RESORT, PERCEIVING A GREATER RISK OF

RETALIATION.

X--ALTHOUGH MORE TOXIC THAN CHEMICAL WEAPONS, BIOLOGICAL

WEAPONS HAVE LESS UTILITY ON THE BATTLEFIELD BECAUSE THEIR EFFECTS

DO NOT MATERIALIZE FOR DAYS. THUS, WE JUDGE IRAQ WOULD BE UNLIKELY

TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS AGAINST US OR ALLIED FORCES ON THE

BATTLEFIELD.

IN THE CURRENT, NONCOMBAT SITUATION:

X--THE IRAQIS ARE NOT LIKELY TO USE EITHER CHEMICAL OR

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS OVERTLY.

X--IF THE TRADE EMBARGO BEGINS TO CAUSE MAJOR DISRUPTIONS,

HOWEVER, SADDAM CAN BE EXPECTED TO MAKE MORE OR LESS EXPLICIT

THREATS TO USE CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO RETALIATE AGAINST

THOSE RESPONSIBLE.

X--IF IRAQ'S CONDITION CONTINUED TO DETERIORATE, THE

POSSIBILITY THAT SADDAM WOULD ORDER COVERT CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL

WEAPON ATTACKS AGAINST US OR OTHER ALLIED TARGETS WOULD INCREASE.

X--SPECIAL FORCES OR OTHER AGENTS COULD COVERTLY DELIVER

CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO SELECTED TARGETS IN ALMOST ANY

COUNTRY.

LIKELIHOOD OF WARNING







SADDAM

HUSAYN, WHO PERSONALLY CONTROLS THE RELEASE OF BOTH KINDS OF

WEAPONS, WOULD USE SECURE MEANS TO ORDER THEIR USE.

THIS INFORMATION IS

DISCUSSION

AFTER NEARLY TWO DECADES OF WORK, IRAQ HAS DEVELOPED THE MOST

EXTENSIVE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE (CW AND BW) PROGRAMS IN

THE THIRD WORLD

IRAQ USED TACTICAL CHEMICAL WEAPONS EXTENSIVELY IN ITS WAR WITH

IRAN. BEGINNING WITH SMALL-SCALE AND RATHER INEFFECTUAL EFFORTS, BY

THE END OF THE WAR IRAQ HAD DEVELOPED A LARGE, ROBUST, AND

SOPHISTICATED CW CAPABILITY THAT WAS FULLY INTEGRATED INTO ITS

MILITARY SYSTEM. IRAQ'S CHEMICAL WEAPONS PLAYED AN IMPORTANT IF NOT

DECISIVE ROLE IN THE CLIMACTIC BATTLES IN THE SPRING OF 1988 THAT

FINALLY FORCED IRAN TO AGREE TO A CEASE-FIRE. REPORTEDLY, THE IRAQI

HIGH COMMAND HAD COME TO CONSIDER CHEMICAL AGENTS AS AMONG ITS MOST

EFFECTIVE WEAPONS AGAINST IRANIAN GROUND ATTACKS.

IRAQ ALSO HAS AN AGGRESSIVE BIOLOGICAL WEAPON DEVELOPMENT

PROGRAM. BUT AS FAR AS WE KNOW THE IRAQIS DID NOT USE BIOLOGICAL

WEAPONS IN THE WAR WITH IRAN. SINCE THE BIOLOGICAL AGENTS IN IRAQ'S

INVENTORY DO NOT IMMEDIATELY INCAPACITATE THE VICTIM, THEY ARE MORE

SUITABLE FOR STRATEGIC USE THAN FOR TACTICAL, BATTLEFIELD USE.







IRAQ HAS DEVELOPED AND COMBAT TESTED A WIDE VARIETY OF TACTICAL

CHEMICAL WEAPON DELIVERY MEANS, CHIEFLY ARTILLERY SHELLS, ROCKETS,

AND BOMBS                 IRAQ HAS ALSO PRODUCED SOME BALLISTIC

MISSILE WARHEADS WITH CHEMICAL AND POSSIBLY BIOLOGICAL AGENT FILLS,

BUT THESE STRATEGIC DELIVERY SYSTEMS HAVE NOT BEEN TESTED IN COMBAT.







IRAQ BEGAN DEVELOPING CW AND BW CAPABILITIES AND BALLISTIC

MISSILE DELIVERY SYSTEMS TO DETER ANY ATTACK BY ISRAEL,







BUT THE WAR WITH IRAN TAUGHT SADDAM HUSAYN THAT CHEMICAL WEAPONS, AT

LEAST, ARE TOO USEFUL TO RESERVE FOR DETERRENCE ONLY.

SADDAM NOW VIEWS THEM AS A VALUABLE COMPLEMENT TO HIS LARGE

CONVENTIONAL ARSENAL.

CHEMICAL WEAPONS

WHILE IRAQ FIRST COVETED CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN THE LATE 1960S,

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D) BEGAN IN EARNEST IN 1972.







BY THE END OF THE WAR,

WHICH IRAQ'S INCREASINGLY HEAVY USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS HELPED TO

BRING ABOUT, THE IRAQIS HAD ESTABLISHED A SIZABLE AND SOPHISTICATED

INFRASTRUCTURE FOR R&D, PRODUCTION, TESTING, AND STORAGE OF CHEMICAL

WEAPONS

THE 1988 CEASE-FIRE WITH IRAN DID NOT DIMINISH THE IMPORTANCE

OF IRAQ'S CW PROGRAM, BUT IT DID SIGNIFICANTLY ALTER THE PROGRAM'S

FOCUS. THE DEMANDS OF THE WAR HAD NECESSITATED LARGE-SCALE

PRODUCTION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS. FOLLOWING THE CEASE-FIRE, PRODUCTION

VIRTUALLY STOPPED. THEY WERE NOT NEEDED FOR ANY PROJECTED IMMEDIATE

USE, AND THE SHORT SHELF LIFE, PARTICULARLY OF SARIN, PREVENTED

STOCKPILING FOR FUTURE NEEDS. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER,

CONTINUED UNABATED.







TYPES OF AGENTS. DURING THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR, IRAQ USED SEVERAL

THOUSAND TONS OF MUSTARD AND THE NERVE AGENT SARIN AGAINST IRAN

(MORE THAN TWICE AS MUCH MUSTARD AS SARIN). THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT

IRAQ ALSO USED LESSER AMOUNTS OF THE NERVE AGENTS TABUN AND GF, AS

WELL AS THE RIOT CONTROL AGENT CS. IN EARLY 1984, APPARENTLY ON AN

EXPERIMENTAL BASIS, IRAQ ALSO USED DUSTY MUSTARD--A FINE POWDER

IMPREGNATED WITH MUSTARD AGENT,







IRAQ CAN PRODUCE ANY OR ALL OF

THESE AGENTS--AND PROBABLY ALSO OTHER STANDARD AGENTS, SUCH AS

HYDROGEN CYANIDE AND PHOSGENE OXIME

IRAQ IS MAKING A HIGH-PRIORITY EFFORT TO DEVELOP AND PRODUCE

ADDITIONAL CW AGENTS, INCLUDING AGENTS THAT INDUCE VOMITING, THE

NERVE AGENTS SOMAN AND VX--WHICH ARE BOTH MUCH MORE TOXIC AND

PERSISTENT THAN SARIN--AND CROWN ETHERS, WHICH ARE NOT ONLY TOXIC IN

THEMSELVES BUT ALSO CAN BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER AGENTS

PROBABLY, THEY HAVE ALREADY PRODUCED

AND WEAPONIZED SMALL QUANTITIES, OF VX. IN ADDITION TO LETHAL AGENTS,

THEY USED VOMITING AGENTS AGAINST REBELLIOUS KURDS IN 1988.







QUANTITIES OF AGENTS. ((AS A ROUGH ESTIMATE, UNDER OPTIMUM

CONDITIONS, l TON OF PERSISTENT NERVE AGENT WILL KILL ROUGHLY HALF

THE UNPROTECTED PERSONS IN AN OPEN AREA OF 2 OR 3 SQUARE KILMETERS.







IN THE SPRING OF 1990, THE IRAQIS RESUMED

PRODUCTION OF SARIN AND MUSTARD. THEY COULD HAVE PRODUCED ABOUT 300

TONS OF EACH BY THE TIME PRODUCTION REPORTEDLY STOPPED IN LATE JULY.

UPON RESUMPTION THE IRAQIS COULD ADD TO THIS INVENTORY AT THE RATE

OF 6 TO 1 0 TONS PER DAY. THE 600 TONS OF NEW AGENT PLUS PROBABLE

STOCKS OF LEFTOVER MUSTARD WOULD BE ENOUGH TO SUSTAIN IRAQI FORCES

FOR ABOUT A WEEK AT AN INTENSE COMBAT EXPENDITURE RATE SUCH AS THAT

EMPLOYED BY IRAQ DURING THE 30-HOUR BATTLE OF AL FAW IN APRIL 1988.

IT WOULD ALSO BE MORE THAN ENOUGH TO EQUIP HUNDREDS OF MISSILES WITH

CHEMICAL WARHEADS

IN AN EFFORT TO LENGTHEN THE SHELF LIFE OF ITS CHEMICAL AGENTS,

IRAQ HAS BEEN WORKING TO IMPROVE THE PURITY OF ITS PRECURSOR

CHEMICALS. IRAQ HAS PROBABLY ALSO PRODUCED BINARY MUNITIONS WHICH,

BECAUSE FINAL MIXING DOES NOT OCCUR UNTIL JUST BEFORE USE, WOULD

HAVE A LONGER STORAGE LIFE THAN UNITARY MUNITIONS AND BE SAFER TO

HANDLE, AS WELL. A DISADVANTAGE IS THAT BINARY MUNITIONS DELIVER

SOMEWHAT LESS AGENT THAN THE SAME SIZE UNITARY MUNITIONS

TACTICAL WEAPONIZATION.          IN ANTICIPATION OF

HOSTILITIES, IRAQ HAS WEAPONIZED MOST OF ITS CHEMICAL AGENT

STOCKPILE. DURING THE WAR WITH IRAN, IRAQI CHEMICAL AGENTS WERE

GENERALLY WEAPONIZED AND USED SOON AFTER PRODUCTION







THE IRAQIS CAN DELIVER CHEMICAL AGENTS IN A VARIETY OF WAYS.

DURING THE WAR WITH IRAN, THEY MADE EXTENSIVE USE OF 250-KILOGRAM

AERIAL BOMBS, 90-MILLIMETER (90-MM) AIR-TO-GROUND ROCKETS, AND

HELICOPTER-MOUNTED AERIAL SPRAY DEVICES. THEY ALSO HAD I- TO 3-

KILOGRAM CHEMICAL ROUNDS FOR 82-MM AND 120-MM MORTARS AND 122-MM,

130-MM, 152-MM, AND 155-MM HOWITZERS, AS WELL AS 8-KILOGRAM CHEMICAL

WARHEADS FOR 122-MM ROCKETS.







A VARIETY OF OTHER WEAPONS, INCLUDING FROG ROCKETS AND AIR-TO-

SURFACE MISSILES, COULD BE USED TO DELIVER CHEMICAL AGENTS,







NEVERTHELESS, IRAQ HAS THE TECHNOLOGY AND EXPERTISE TO PRODUCE

EFFECTIVE CHEMICAL AGENT PAYLOADS FOR THEM.

DEFENSIVE CAPABILITIES. IRAQ PRODUCES INDIGENOUSLY MOST OF THE

ITEMS REQUIRED FOR PROTECTION AGAINST CHEMICAL AGENTS. IN FACT IT

EXPORTS PROTECTIVE MASKS, FILTERS, SUITS, BOOTS, AND GLOVES. THE

QUALITY OF SOME OF THIS EQUIPMENT IS POOR, HOWEVER, AND IRAQ IMPORTS

BETTER EQUIPMENT FROM FOREIGN SOURCES







IRAQI FORCES UNDERSTAND WELL THE FUNDAMENTALS OF CW PROTECTION,

IN PARTICULAR THE NEED TO PROPERLY MAINTAIN PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT.

SINCE THE END OF THE WAR WITH IRAN, THEY HAVE CONTINUED TO TRAIN FOR

OPERATIONS IN A CW ENVIRONMENT







BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS

BIOLOGICAL AGENTS, THOUGH GENERALLY SLOWER ACTING, ARE USUALLY

ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE MORE TOXIC THAN THE MOST TOXIC CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

THEREFORE, THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS WOULD BE

MOST EFFECTIVE WOULD DIFFER CONSIDERABLY FROM THE CIRCUMSTANCES THAT

WOULD CALL FOR CHEMICAL WEAPONS. IRAQ'S BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS WOULD BE

MORE USEFUL AGAINST STRATEGIC TARGETS, SUCH AS CITIES, THAN AGAINST

BATTLEFIELD TARGETS

IRAQ HAS NOT, TO OUR KNOWLEDGE, EVER USED BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS.

HOWEVER, ON THE BASIS OF SUBSTANTIAL INTELLIGENCE CONCERNING THE

EFFORTS OF IRAQ TO ACQUIRE EQUIPMENT AND BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS

ABROAD, WE BELIEVE IT HAS NOW DEVELOPED AND STOCKPILED BIOLOGICAL

WEAPONS

TYPES OF AGENTS. SINCE 1989, IRAQ HAS BEEN PRODUCING TWO

BIOLOGICAL AGENTS: BOTULINUM TOXIN AND ANTHRAX. THE IRAQIS ARE

PROBABLY TRYING TO DEVELOP OTHER TOXINS AND LIVE AGENTS:

X--BOTULINUM IS A TOXIN THAT ATTACKS THE NERVOUS SYSTEM. A FEW

MILLIONTHS OF A GRAM IS A LETHAL DOSE. SYMPTOMS USUALLY DO NOT OCCUR

FOR AT LEAST 12 HOURS AFTER EXPOSURE, WITH DEATH OCCURRING PERHAPS

DAYS LATER. BOTULINUM TOXIN DEGRADES WITHIN HOURS IN SUNLIGHT.

X--ANTHRAX WOULD BE DISPERSED AS SPORES, WHICH CAUSE PULMONARY

FAILURE SOME DAYS AFTER INHALATION. ANTHRAX SPORES ARE HARDY AND CAN

REMAIN VIABLE IN THE SOIL FOR YEARS.

X--BOTH OF THESE SUBSTANCES OCCUR NATURALLY, ALTHOUGH ONLY

RARELY; THUS, ISOLATED DEATHS CAUSED BY BOTULINUM TOXIN OR ANTHRAX

SPORES WOULD NOT NECESSARILY BE IMMEDIATELY ATTRIBUTED TO A BW

ATTACK

THE BOTULINUM TOXIN IS PROBABLY BEING PRODUCED AT A VACCINE

PLANT          IN A

WESTERN SUBURB OF BAGHDAD. THE ANTHRAX IS PROBABLY BEING PRODUCED AT

A BW FACILITY AT SALMAN PAK OR TAJI. THE IRAQIS MAY BE USING THE

FERMENTERS          TO

PRODUCE THE ANTHRAX SPORES.

QUANTITIES OF AGENTS

IRAQ HAS THE CAPABILITY TO PRODUCE ENOUGH OF

EITHER EACH DAY TO LETHALLY CONTAMINATE HUNDREDS OF SQUARE

KILOMETERS OF TERRITORY. IN OTHER WORDS, IRAQ COULD EASILY AND

QUICKLY PRODUCE ENOUGH ANTHRAX SPORES AND BOTULINUM TOXIN TO SATISFY

ANY CONCEIVABLE DEMAND







BECAUSE OF THE MUCH GREATER TOXICITY OF BW AGENTS

COMPARED WITH CW AGENTS, ONLY SMALL AMOUNTS WOULD BE NEEDED TO

ACHIEVE ENORMOUS IMPACT







TACTICAL WEAPONIZATION. IRAQ HAS AVAILABLE A NUMBER OF TACTICAL

WEAPON SYSTEMS THAT COULD BE ADAPTED FOR USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AGENTS,

INCLUDING MOST OF THOSE ADAPTED FOR USE WITH CHEMICAL AGENTS.







SINCE IRAQ'S BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS HAVE NEVER BEEN COMBAT TESTED,

THE IRAQIS MAY HARBOR SOME DOUBTS ABOUT HOW WELL THEY WILL WORK--

ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING HOW LONG IT TOOK THEM TO LEARN TO USE

CHEMICAL WEAPONS EFFECTIVELY. THIS MIGHT NOT PREVENT THEM FROM USING

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, HOWEVER. IN THE WAR WITH IRAN, IRAQ TESTED MANY

OF ITS CHEMICAL WEAPONS ON THE BATTLEFIELD. MOREOVER, SOME OF THE

LESSONS THE IRAQIS LEARNED IN PERFECTING THEIR CHEMICAL WEAPONS

WOULD BE APPLICABLE TO BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS AS WELL

DEFENSIVE CAPABILITIES. VACCINES ARE AVAILABLE THAT PROVIDE

SUBSTANTIAL PROTECTION AGAINST BOTH BOTULINUM TOXIN AND ANTHRAX

SPORES







STRATEGIC WEAPONIZATION

AIRCRAFT. IRAQ HAS MIRAGE, BADGER, AND FENCER AIRCRAFT THAT

COULD ACCURATELY DELIVER CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL PAYLOADS OVER LONG

DISTANCES. FOR EXAMPLE, THE MIRAGE COULD DELIVER SEVERAL 250-

KILOGRAM BOMBS A FEW HUNDRED KILOMETERS. USE OF THESE AIRCRAFT WOULD

BE AN ATTRACTIVE OPTION AGAINST LIGHTLY DEFENDED TARGETS, BUT THE

IRAQIS WOULD ANTICIPATE A HIGH ATTRITION RATE AMONG AIRCRAFT

ATTACKING TARGETS DEFENDED BY US OR OTHER AIRCRAFT AND

GROUND AND SHIP-BASED ANTIAIRCRAFT SYSTEMS.

BALLISTIC MISSILES. IRAQ'S PRIMARY STRATEGIC WEAPONS ARE ITS

SHORT-RANGE BALLISTIC MISSILES. WE ESTIMATE IRAQ HAS ABOUT 700 SCUD-

TYPE MISSILES; IT COULD HAVE CONSIDERABLY MORE. SEVERAL HUNDRED OF

THESE--THE AL HUSAYN AND AL ABBAS MISSILES--ARE INDIGENOUSLY

MODIFIED SCUDS DESIGNED TO DELIVER LIGHTER WARHEADS TO TARGETS AT

GREATER DISTANCES THAN THE 300-KILOMETER LIMIT OF STANDARD SCUDS:

X--WE ARE CERTAIN THAT IRAQ HAS SOME CHEMICAL WARHEADS,







X--WE ALSO THINK IT LIKELY THAT IRAQ PLANS TO DEVELOP

BIOLOGICAL WARHEADS FOR THESE MISSILES, IF IT HAS NOT DONE SO

ALREADY







THE AL ABBAS, THE LONGEST RANGE MODIFIED SCUD, COULD DELIVER

COMPARATIVELY SMALL QUANTITIES OF AGENT (ON THE ORDER OF 85

KILOGRAMS) AN ESTIMATED 735 KILOMETERS. THE OTHER SCUD-TYPE MISSILES

COULD DELIVER PROPORTIONATELY LARGER QUANTITIES TO CLOSER TARGETS.







ABOUT HALF A SQUARE KILOMETER.







CITIES AND OTHER AREA TARGETS SUCH AS AIRFIELDS AND LARGE

INDUSTRIAL OR MILITARY FACILITIES ARE THE MOST LIKELY TARGETS FOR

IRAQ'S MODIFIED SCUDS, BECAUSE THEIR POOR ACCURACY MAKES THEM

UNSUITABLE FOR USE AGAINST POINT TARGETS. IF LAUNCHED FROM IRAQ'S

WESTERN DESERT, SUCH MISSILES COULD REACH lSRAEL AND PARTS OF EGYPT.

IF LAUNCHED FROM SOUTHERN IRAQ OR KUWAIT, SUCH MISSILES COULD REACH

AS FAR SOUTH AS RIYADH AND QATAR

THE OBJECTIVE OF ATTACKING CITIES WOULD BE TO CAUSE CASUALTIES

AND PANIC AMONG CIVILIANS. UNDER OPTIMUM CIRCUMSTANCES, A NERVE

AGENT WARHEAD COULD CAUSE MANY HUNDREDS AND POSSIBLY EVEN THOUSANDS

OF IMMEDIATE CASUALTIES, INCLUDING A LARGE NUMBER OF NEARLY

IMMEDIATE FATALITIES. THE FATALITY COUNT FROM A BIOLOGICAL WEAPON

WOULD BE MUCH HIGHER, ALTHOUGH THE FULL EFFECTS WOULD NOT BE FELT

FOR SOME DAYS. THE LACK OF ACCURACY OF IRAQ'S SCUDS WOULD NOT REDUCE

THEIR PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT, SINCE NO ONE IN A TARGET COMMUNITY WOULD

FEEL SAFE

THE OBJECTIVE OF ATTACKING AN AIRFIELD, ON THE OTHER HAND,

WOULD NOT BE TO CAUSE CASUALTIES SO MUCH AS TO PUT ITS DEFENSES OUT

OF COMMISSION. WHILE A CHEMICAL WEAPON ATTACK WOULD PROBABLY NOT

CLOSE A MILITARILY PREPARED AIRPORT FOR MORE THAN A FEW HOURS,

SADDAM MIGHT CALCULATE THAT WOULD BE LONG ENOUGH FOR IRAQI AIRCRAFT

TO ATTACK THE AIRPORT WITH MORE ACCURATE WEAPONS THAT COULD CAUSE

GREATER AND MORE LASTING DAMAGE

IRAQ HAS LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN DELIVERING BIOLOGICAL OR

CHEMICAL AGENTS VIA MISSILE. DURING THE WAR, IRAQ LAUNCHED HUNDREDS

OF SCUD MISSILES TOWARD IRAN, BUT AS FAR AS WE KNOW ALL OF THEM HAD

HIGH-EXPLOSIVE WARHEADS







IN THE ABSENCE OF COMBAT EXPERIENCE 

THE IRAQIS DO NOT KNOW FOR SURE HOW EFFECTIVE THE CHEMICAL

AND BIOLOGICAL WARHEADS ON THEIR MISSILES WOULD BE. THAT MIGHT NOT

MATTER TOO MUCH TO SADDAM IF CHEMICAL WARHEADS ARE USED. BUT, FACING

ADVERSARIES WITH STRONG RETALIATORY CAPABILITIES, SADDAM WOULD

PROBABLY NOT EMPLOY BIOLOGICAL WARHEADS UNLESS HE WAS CONFIDENT THEY

WOULD WORK WELL--OR WAS IN SUCH DESPERATE STRAITS THAT HE DID NOT

CARE WHETHER THEY WORKED OR NOT.

UNCONVENTIONAL DELIVERY SYSTEMS. IRAQ COULD ATTACK TARGETS OUT

OF RANGE OF EVEN ITS MISSILES BY USING SPECIAL FORCES, CIVILIAN

GOVERNMENT AGENTS, OR FOREIGN TERRORISTS TO HAND-DELIVER BIOLOGICAL

OR CHEMICAL AGENTS CLANDESTINELY. EVEN IN REGIONS WITHIN RANGE OF

IRAQ'S BOMBERS AND MISSILES, THAT MIGHT BE THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO

ATTACK SPECIFIC SITES WITH SUCH WEAPONS. IT WOULD BE AN ESPECIALLY

ATTRACTIVE OPTION IF IRAQ WISHED TO CONDUCT SUCH AN ATTACK WITHOUT

OFFICIALLY ACKNOWLEDGING AUTHORSHIP

IN THE PAST, IRAQI "DIPLOMATS" HAVE BEEN REPEATEDLY

IMPLICATED IN LETHAL ACTS OF TERRORISM, ALTHOUGH MOSTLY DIRECTED

AGAINST IRAQI CITIZENS ABROAD. EVEN BEFORE IT INVADED KUWAIT,

BAGHDAD HAD BEEN CULTIVATING A  NUMBER OF PALESTINIAN TERRORIST

GROUPS, INCLUDING SEVERAL--SUCH AS THE ABU NIDAL ORGANIZATION AND

THE PFLP GENERAL COMMAND--WITH OPERATIONAL CAPABILITIES IN NUMEROUS

COUNTRIES, ESPECIALLY IN EUROPE. ALREADY, SOME OF THESE TERRORIST

GROUPS HAVE PUBLICLY VOLUNTEERED TO ATTACK US TARGETS ON BEHALF OF

IRAQ. TO BE SURE,THERE HAVE BEEN NO INDICATIONS YET THAT THEY COULD

OR WOULD USE CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS.

DOCTRINE AND TACTICS

THERE IS AMPLE AND PERSUASIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE IRAQIS HAVE

INCORPORATED THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN BOTH STRATEGIC AND

TACTICAL WAR PLANNING.

WE DOUBT SADDAM WOULD HAVE DIRECTED THAT

SUCH WEAPONS BE DEVELOPED WITHOUT INTENDING TO USE THEM IN CERTAIN

CONTINGENCIES







SADDAM PERSONALLY DECIDES UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES AND

EXTENT BW AND CW WEAPONS ARE USED. DURING THE WAR WITH IRAN, ONCE HE

HAD AUTHORIZED THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN A SPECIFIC CAMPAIGN OR

BATTLE, THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE WHEN AND HOW SUCH WEAPONS WOULD

ACTUALLY BE EMPLOYED WAS DELEGATED TO THE ARMY COMMANDERS. BY 1986,

CORPS COMMANDERS HAD THIS AUTHORITY. THE IRAQIS WOULD PROBABLY DO

THE SAME IN ANY FUTURE MAJOR CONFLICT

SADDAM IS UNDOUBTEDLY AWARE OF THE ESCALATORY POTENTIAL OF

USING CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS AGAINST AN ADVERSARY CAPABLE OF

ESCALATION, SUCH AS THE UNITED STATES. HE WOULD CERTAINLY WEIGH THE

POTENTIAL UTILITY OF ANY USE OF SUCH WEAPONS AGAINST THE RISK OF

RETALIATION IN KIND--OR WORSE. IN MAKING HIS CALCULATIONS, SADDAM

WOULD PROBABLY HAVE SOMETHING LIKE THE FOLLOWING IN MIND:







CHEMICAL  BIOLOGICAL

WEAPONS  WEAPONS

TACTICAL  UTILITY HIGH    LOW

STRATEGIC UTILITY  MODERATE   HIGH

RISK OF SEVERE     HIGH    VERY HIGH

RETALIATION







CHEMICAL WEAPONS. SADDAM EVIDENTLY BELIEVES THAT THE UNITED

STATES HAS BOTH A CHEMICAL AND A NUCLEAR CAPABILITY IN THE THEATER.

BUT WE DOUBT THAT WOULD DETER HIM FROM EMPLOYING CHEMICAL WEAPONS IN

A MAJOR CONFLICT WITH THE MULTINATIONAL FORCE







WE JUDGE THAT

SADDAM VALUES THE FORCE-MULTIPLICATION CAPABILITY OF CHEMICAL

WEAPONS TOO HIGHLY TO FORGO THEIR USE IN ANY IMPORTANT COMBAT

SITUATION WHERE USING THEM WOULD PROVIDE SUBSTANTIAL TACTICAL

BENEFITS. CONSEQUENTLY, WE ESTIMATE THAT:

X--IRAQI FORCES WOULD BE VIRTUALLY CERTAIN TO USE CHEMICAL

WEAPONS IN ANY DEFENSIVE SITUATION IN IRAQ OR KUWAIT WHERE THEY WERE

BEING PUSHED BACK BY AN ALLIED OFFENSIVE







X--IRAQI FORCES WOULD BE HIGHLY LIKELY TO USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS

AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF ANY OFFENSIVE INTO TERRITORY DEFENDED BY THE

UNITED STATES AND ALLIED FORCES.

X--ONCE THE IRAQI FORCES HAD BEGUN USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS

AGAINST ALLIED FORCES, WE ANTICIPATE THEY WOULD BE WILLING TO USE

THEIR ENTIRE CHEMICAL ARSENAL, INCLUDING MISSILES WITH CHEMICAL

WARHEADS.

X--SPECIAL FORCES OR OTHER AGENTS COULD ALSO HAND-DELIVER

CHEMICAL WEAPONS TO SELECTED TARGETS IN ALMOST ANY COUNTRY.

DURING THEIR WAR WITH IRAN, THE IRAQIS LEARNED TO USE CHEMICAL

WEAPONS IN WAYS THAT MAXIMIZED THEIR EFFECTIVENESS. FOR EXAMPLE,

THEY DISSEMINATED CHEMICAL AGENTS IN THE MORNING RATHER THAN LATER

IN THE DAY, 

TYPICALLY, THE IRAQIS WOULD DEPOSIT PERSISTENT MUSTARD

AGENT IN AN IRANIAN FORCE'S REAR AREA AND THEN BOMBARD THE

FRONTLINES WITH NONPERSISTENT BUT HIGHLY LETHAL SARIN. THE PANIC-

STRICKEN IRANIAN SOLDIERS FLEEING TO THE REAR WOULD RUN RIGHT INTO

THE MUSTARD.

IN ADDITION TO BATTLEFIELD EMPLOYMENT FOR ANTIPERSONNEL AND

AREA-DENIAL PURPOSES, TARGETS DEEP IN THE REAR SUCH AS LOGISTIC

STOCKPILES, PORTS, AND AIRFIELDS WOULD ALSO BE ATTACKED. AIRFIELDS,

IN PARTICULAR, WOULD BE CONSIDERED CRITICAL TARGETS BECAUSE OF THE

IMPORTANCE OF US AND ALLIED AIR POWER. AGAINST AN AIRFIELD, CHEMICAL

WEAPONS COULD BEST BE USED TO SUPPRESS DEFENSES LONG ENOUGH FOR

IRAQI AIRCRAFT TO CARRY OUT STRIKES WITH HIGH-EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS.

OCCASIONAL HARASSING ATTACKS COULD BE CONDUCTED AGAINST A WIDE RANGE

OF TARGETS TO KEEP ENEMY FORCES JUMPY AND DEMORALIZED. WE DO NOT

BELIEVE THE IRAQIS COULD EFFECTIVELY CONDUCT EITHER BW OR CW ATTACKS

AGAINST BLOCKADING NAVAL SHIPS. BUT THEY MIGHT TRY ANYWAY

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS.

WE JUDGE THAT SADDAM HUSAYN UNDERSTANDS THAT USING

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS ON ANY SUBSTANTIAL SCALE ENTAILS A MUCH MORE

SERIOUS RISK OF MASSIVE RATALIATION THAN USING CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

ACCORDINGLY, WE BELIEVE, SADDAM REGARDS BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS PRIMARILY

AS DETERRENTS AND DOOMSDAY WEAPONS.

AS A RESULT, WE JUDGE THAT SADDAM WOULD REFRAIN FROM USING

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS UNTIL HE PERCEIVED HIS SITUATION TO BE DESPERATE-

-SUCH AS IF HE WERE BEING SEVERELY PRESSED BY ALLIED MILITARY

ADVANCES OR THE GROWING IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC SANCTIONS.

SADDAM WOULD PROBABLY PRECEDE ANY USE OF BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS WITH

MORE OR LESS EXPLICIT THREATS TO TRY TO ACHIEVE HIS GOALS SHORT OF

ACTUAL USE AND THE ATTENDANT RISK OF RETALIATION. IF HIS THREATS

WERE NOT HEEDED, HOWEVER, WE BELIEVE SADDAM MIGHT ORDER A BIOLOGICAL

WARFARE ATTACK--PROBABLY DELIVERED CLANDESTINELY BY A TERRORIST

AGAINST A REGIONAL TARGET, SO AS TO PRESERVE PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY.

BEYOND THIS, IF SADDAM BELIEVED HIS POSITION WERE CONTINUING TO

DETERIORATE, HE MIGHT AUTHORIZE ADDITIONAL BW ATTACKS AGAINST

TARGETS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD

SADDAM MIGHT ORDER BW MISSILE STRIKES WHETHER HE HOPED THEY

WOULD REVERSE HIS FORTUNES OR HAD ALREADY CONCLUDED HIS CAUSE WAS

HOPELESS. IN THE LATTER CASE, HE WOULD WANT TO TAKE AS MANY OF HIS

ENEMIES WITH HIM AS HE COULD.







DOES IRAQ HAVE RADIOLOGICAL WEAPONS?

IN ADDITION TO CHEMICAL AND

BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, IRAQ MAY HAVE RADIOLOGICAL WEAPONS THAT COULD BE

DELIVERED EITHER BY AIR OR MISSILE:

X--IN 1988, IRAQ REPORTEDLY TESTED AN AIR-DROPPED BOMB THAT

CONTAINED RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS BUT WAS NOT AN ATOMIC BOMB

RESULTS OF THE TEST WERE SENT TO THE PRESIDENTIAL PALACE.







THE IRAQIS COULD HAVE OBTAINED SOME RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL FROM

OPERATION OF THEIR RESEARCH REACTORS. 





THE IRAQIS MAY PLAN TO DISPERSE THIS MATERIAL USING A

CONVENTIONAL EXPLOSIVE CHARGE

WE DOUBT THAT THE AMOUNT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL AVAILABLE IS

ENOUGH TO PRODUCE A MILITARILY SIGNIFICANT WEAPON. IF IRAQ HAS A

RADIATION WEAPON, IT PROBABLY WOULD BE USED AS A LAST RESORT, WITH

THE INTENTION OF CAUSING PANIC IN A CITY. ITS DETONATION WOULD BE

UNLIKELY TO CAUSE WIDESPREAD RADIATION SICKNESS BUT WOULD REQUIRE AN

EXPENSIVE CLEANUP.







INDICATIONS AND WARNING







THE INDICATIONS

WHETHER IRAQI FORCES WERE PREPARED TO USE SUCH

WEAPONS WE HAVE ALREADY SEEN. THEY ARE READY NOW. THE AUTHORIZATION

TO PROCEED WITH CHEMICAL WEAPONS WOULD PROBABLY BE CONVEYED BY

SECURE MEANS

SIMILARLY, THE IRAQIS COULD ATTACK US FORCES OR OTHER TARGETS

WITH BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS







IRAQ'S PAST USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS

IN THE WAR WITH IRAN

BETWEEN 1983 AND 1988, IRAQ USED CHEMICAL WEAPONS ON A SCALE

NOT SEEN SINCE WORLD WAR 1. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THESE ATTACKS WAS

MINIMAL AT FIRST BUT INCREASED GRADUALLY AS IRAQ GAINED EXPERIENCE

IN CW AND DEVELOPED NEW AGENTS, WEAPONS, AND TACTICS

ON 17 MARCH 1984 IRAQ USED THE NERVE

AGENT TABUN AGAINST IRAN, EARNING THE DUBIOUS HONOR OF BEING THE

FIRST NATION TO USE NERVE AGENTS IN BATTLE. CHEMICAL WEAPONS HELPED

BRING THE WAR TO A FAIRLY SUDDEN CONCLUSION IN 1988, WHEN IRAQ

INCORPORATED MASSED NERVE AGENT STRIKES INTO A SERIES OF HIGHLY

SUCCESSFUL OFFENSIVES

IRAQI USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS AGAINST IRAN CAN BE DIVIDED INTO

THREE DISTINCT PHASES. THE FIRST PHASE, WHICH CONTINUED UNTIL 1986,

INVOLVED THE USE OF CW AGENTS IN A STRICTLY DEFENSIVE ROLE, TO

DISRUPT OR HALT IRANIAN OFFENSIVES. IN A TRANSITION PHASE LASTING

FROM LATE 1986 TO EARLY 1988, IRAQ USED CHEMICAL WEAPONS

PREEMPTIVELY AGAINST STAGING AREAS PRIOR TO IRANIAN OFFENSIVES,

WHILE CONTINUING TO RELY ON CW TO DISRUPT THESE OFFENSIVES. FINALLY,

AND MOST SIGNIFICANTLY, IRAQ USED MASSED NERVE AGENT STRIKES AS AN

INTEGRAL PART OF ITS WELL-ORCHESTRATED OFFENSIVES IN THE SPRING AND

SUMMER OF 1988. THE SUCCESS OF THESE OFFENSIVES PROMPTED IRAN TO

ACCEPT A CEASE-FIRE IN AUGUST 1988

WE ASSESS THAT IRAQ DECIDED TO USE CHEMICAL WEAPONS AS A FORCE

MULTIPLIER TO COMPENSATE FOR IRAN'S MANPOWER ADVANTAGE. IRAQ'S USE

OF CW HELPED TO MINIMIZE IRAQI PERSONNEL AND TERRITORIAL LOSSES BY

STALLING IRANIAN HUMAN WAVE ATTACKS. IRAQI CW USE WAS ENHANCED BY

THE LIMITED IRANIAN CW PROTECTIVE CAPABILITY AND IRAN'S INABILITY TO

RETALIATE IN KIND ON ANY APPRECIABLE SCALE.







AS THE WAR PROGRESSED, THE IRAQIS BECAME MUCH MORE PROFICIENT

IN THE USE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS. WE BELIEVE THAT ONE REASON FOR THIS

WAS THE DELEGATION OF CW RELEASE AUTHORITY TO IRAQI CORPS COMMANDERS

IN 1986. THIS PERMITTED BETTER INTEGRATION OF CW INTO BATTLEFIELD

PLANNING. BEFORE 1986, SADDAM HUSAYN PERSONALLY CONTROLLED THE

RELEASE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS.







DURING THE FINAL MONTHS OF THE WAR, IRAQ MADE HEAVY USE OF CHEMICAL

WEAPONS.







THE REGIME USED BOTH 

LETHAL AND NONLETHAL CHEMICAL AGENTS AGAINST IRAQI KURDS IN LATE

AUGUST 1988







END OF MESSAGE







1.5 (c)

(62758:62758)

Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search