GulfLINK banner
Site Map | Search | Contact Us
LIBRARY
  Overview
Case Narratives
Environmental Exposure Reports
Information Papers
RAND Reports
NEWS ARCHIVE
  Overview
Press Releases
Speeches
HELP FOR VETERANS
  Overview
Medical Information
Medals
The 1990-1991 Gulf War Story
Related Sites
FAQS
  Overview
Depleted Uranium
Khamisiyah
Pyridostigmine Bromide

Cardiovascular Hyporeactivity and Immune System Functioning in Gulf War Veterans with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Arnold Peckerman, Ph.D., Benjamin H. Natelson, M.D., John J. LaManca, Ph.D.,
Claudia Pollet, M.D., Sharon L. Smith, B.S., and John Ottenweller, Ph.D.

East Orange DVA Medical Center

Introduction. Severe chronic fatigue is one of the most common and disabling health problems among veterans of the Gulf War (GVs). This study tested a hypothesis that centrally-originating abnormalities in sympathetic control of circulation contribute to symptoms in GVs with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). The study also examined for alterations in immune functioning in GVs with CFS as a possible factor in autonomic dysregulation.

Procedures. The study sample consisted of 35 VA Gulf War Registry veterans who met CDC criteria for CFS and 34 healthy Registry veterans. Cardiovascular sympathetic function was examined as hemodynamic responses to the cold pressor test, and two cognitive challenges, an evaluative speech task and mental arithmetic. Response measurements included blood pressure (BP), and impedance cardiography-derived stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (Q), total peripheral resistance (TPR), and Heather Index of myocardial contractility (HI). Immune measures included enumeration of monocytes, granulocytes, lymphocyte subsets, and concentration of cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL10, IL-12, interferon-?, and TNF-a) in plasma.

Results. During behavioral stress testing, GVs with CFS displayed greatly attenuated BP responses to speech (p<.0001) and mental calculations (p<.005). In contrast, no differences in responses were observed during the cold pressor test. Diminished BP responses to cognitive stressors in veterans with CFS were associated with a lower SV, Q, and HI values, and increased TPR (ps<.05), indicating a low flow circulatory state. Significantly, within the CFS group, fatigue severity was predictive of low blood pressure responses to cognitive stressors (R2=.20, p<.008). On measures of immune function, veterans with CFS had higher monocytes and neutrophils counts (ps<.05), and lower NK (p<.05) and higher T-helper cell subsets (p<.005). This pattern of changes in immune cells in Gvs with CFS was associated with increased concentration of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, and TNF-a cytokines. Stepwise multiple regression analyses examined the relationship between these indicators of immune activation and cardiovascular hypofunction. A combination of higher monocyte and TNF-a levels was predictive of low BP responses to cognitive stressors (R2=.43, p<.0001). Lower resting Q was associated with lower TNF-a levels, and hanges in Q during cognitive tasks were negatively related to IL-10 levels (ps<.05).

Conclusions. The diminished blood pressure responsiveness to cognitive but not sensory stress in GVs with CFS is consistent with a hypothesis that a central nervous system disorder involving integration between higher cortical brain functioning and sympathetic control of circulation may be the underlying pathology in these veterans. Low flow circulatory pattern displayed by GVs with CFS suggests a mechanism through which autonomic dysregulation may become expressed as symptoms of CFS. This study also indicates that in part, autonomic dysregulation in GVs with CFS may be related to immune activation, involving proliferation of monocytes and their cytokine products, including TNF-a, as well as an increased activity of Th2 cytokines, notably IL-10. Further research extending these findings into the specific mechanisms of the observed cardiac hypofunction and its relation to immune factors holds considerable promise for future clinical interventions.

Keywords: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Cardiac Output, Stress Reactivity

This work was supported by DVA Medical Research Funds and DVA NJCEHR

Return to Stress

DHA Address: 7700 Arlington Boulevard | Suite 5101 | Falls Church, VA | 22042-5101

Some documents are presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). A PDF reader is required for viewing.

Download a PDF Reader or learn more about PDFs.